Stranded capacity, quantified
Circuit-level measurement usually turns up power or cooling headroom nobody was counting on, and just as often finds less than the spreadsheet claims. Either way, you're allocating against a real number.
As-built drawings stop being true within weeks
Racks get added off-plan, circuits get re-fed during an outage and never corrected on paper, cooling gets rebalanced by whoever was on site that night. None of it is written down. Within a year, nobody in the building can tell you with confidence how much power or cooling is actually left to allocate.
We measure the facility as it stands rather than as the drawings claim: branch circuit current, rack inlet and outlet temperature, airflow, and every deviation between the two. Nothing is switched or isolated to get that data — it's read, logged and reconciled against your documentation.
What's covered
- Utility feed, UPS, PDU and branch circuit power path
- Cooling capacity, airflow and containment effectiveness
- Space and power headroom against current and forecast load
- Single points of failure across N, N+1 and 2N paths
- Physical security, access control and fire detection readiness
- Monitoring and DCIM coverage gaps
- As-built documentation versus what the plant actually reports
What you get
Failure modes, named
Where a single breaker, chiller or path takes down more than it should. Ranked by likelihood and blast radius, not a generic checklist.
A costed, sequenced roadmap
Not a wish list — a set of remediation items in the order they should happen, each with a rough budget, so finance and facilities are working from the same document.
Monitoring gap analysis
What's already instrumented, what isn't, and what a DCIM rollout would need to close the gap — useful whether or not you deploy DCIM with us.
Independent findings
The report and roadmap are yours to keep and take to any contractor. There's no obligation to engage anomny for the remediation work that follows.
A corrected asset register
Every rack, circuit and cooling unit reconciled against what's physically there, ready to seed a digital twin later if you want one.
How it works
01
Site survey
A walk of the facility with your team, plus a review of single-line diagrams, cooling schematics and change logs against what's physically installed.
02
Instrumented capture
Clamp meters, temperature loggers and read-only access to existing BMS/EPMS/UPS points, run over a representative period rather than a single snapshot.
03
Analysis & modelling
Load, thermal behaviour and failure paths modelled against the measured data, not nameplate ratings, to find where headroom really is.
04
Findings & roadmap
A findings workshop with your team, followed by the written report and a costed, sequenced roadmap you're free to act on however you choose.
Questions about the assessment
How long does an assessment take?
Most single-site assessments run two to four weeks: survey, instrumented data capture, analysis and a findings workshop. Multi-site portfolios are scoped and sequenced site by site.
Do you need to take anything offline?
No. Measurement is non-intrusive — clamp meters, temporary loggers and read-only access to what your BMS, EPMS or UPS already expose. Nothing is switched, isolated or reconfigured during the assessment.
What do we actually get at the end?
A findings report ranked by risk and effort, and a costed, sequenced roadmap. Both are yours to keep and to take to any contractor — there is no obligation to engage anomny for the remediation work.
Can this feed into DCIM later?
Yes. The circuit map, sensor points and as-built corrections captured during the assessment become the seed data for a DCIM deployment and its digital twin, so nothing is measured twice.
Find out what your facility can actually carry
Send us the site, its current load and what's prompting the review. We'll scope the assessment and give you a timeline before anything is booked.