AJEEVI Technologies — AI, IoT and data centre engineering

Home / Viksit Bharat 2047

India makes a fifth of the world’s data and holds three per cent of the racks

Closing that gap by 2047 is not a slogan problem. It is a power, water, land and engineering problem, solved one facility at a time. This is how we design, build and operate against the national mandate — and what we hold ourselves to on every site.

Where the country stands today

Figures as reported for early to mid 2026. They move quickly, and every number below is a design input on a live project, not a poster.

3% of global capacity

Against roughly 20% of the world’s data generated in India. The United States and China together hold close to 70%.

271facilities

Operational data centres in India in early 2026, carrying an estimated 1.57–1.79 GW of live IT power.

8GW targeted

Capacity Gujarat alone intends to develop under its 2026–29 data centre policy, against proposals already near 10 GW.

21years to 2047

A facility commissioned this year will be halfway through its second refresh cycle when the target date arrives. Design for that, not for handover.

Sources: Government of Gujarat, Department of Science & Technology (July 2026); India Briefing on BIS data centre standards (2026); Ministry of Electronics & IT statement in the Rajya Sabha, 7 August 2026.

The five things the mandate actually asks of a facility

National policy, state policy and the standards bodies pull in the same direction even where the drafting differs. Stripped of the language, an operator is being asked for five things.

Measured efficiency, not claimed efficiency

BIS codified India’s first formal standards for cloud, data centre performance and ethical AI in February 2026, through its LITD 31 committee. They are voluntary until a Quality Control Order makes them otherwise.

  • Instrument for PUE, CUE, WUE and CER from day one, not retrofitted at audit
  • Report against the IS/ISO/IEC 30134 series so sites are comparable
  • Write the metric into the SLA, with the meter points named
IS/ISO/IEC 30134 series

Water treated as a constraint, not a utility

Independent analysis of state policies finds a persistent water governance deficit: continuous supply is promised to attract investment, while reuse and consumption obligations stay thin.

  • Closed-loop and adiabatic options modelled against local water stress
  • Rainwater harvesting and treated sewage water designed in, not bolted on
  • WUE targeted alongside PUE, because one can be bought with the other
CEEW, June 2026

Clean and firm power

Renewable procurement through PPAs, with the Nuclear Energy Mission’s 100 GW by 2047 ambition and small modular reactors now part of long-horizon load planning.

Nuclear Energy Mission

Sovereign by construction

Workloads, operational telemetry and models held inside infrastructure the operator controls, with access and retention governed under the DPDP Act, 2023.

DPDP Act, 2023

Climate resilience

Siting and design tested against flood, cyclone, heatwave and seismic exposure — the gap most often named in reviews of current state policy.

Site risk assessment

What we commit to on every site

The standards give the vocabulary. These are the numbers and clauses we are willing to be held to, and where each one comes from.

ReferenceWhat it measuresOur design position
IS/ISO/IEC 30134-2Power Usage Effectiveness (PUE)Design target 1.4 or better on new builds; measured annualised, not on a cool-morning reading
IS/ISO/IEC 30134-7:2023Cooling Efficiency Ratio (CER)Reported per thermal zone, so a single site average cannot hide a failing hall
IS/ISO/IEC 30134-8:2022Carbon Usage Effectiveness (CUE)Tracked against the actual supply mix, including contracted renewable energy
IS/ISO/IEC 30134-9:2022Water Usage Effectiveness (WUE)Modelled at design stage against district water stress; closed-loop preferred in water-scarce zones
BEE building codesEnvelope and equipment efficiencyApplied to the shell and the mechanical plant, evidenced at commissioning
DPDP Act, 2023Personal data handlingTelemetry, camera feeds and model inference stay inside the client perimeter by default
State DC policyIncentives and obligationsMapped per state at feasibility stage, since obligations differ materially between them

The BIS measurement standards are voluntary today. We treat them as binding on our own designs, because the alternative — retrofitting metering after a Quality Control Order lands — costs more and proves less.

A facility built now has to survive four policy cycles

So we plan the estate on the same horizon the country does, and we put the decision points where they can still be acted on.

2026

Instrument and baseline

Metering to the 30134 series, a measured PUE, CUE, WUE and CER baseline, and a costed remediation list for the existing estate.

2030

Decarbonise the supply

Renewable PPAs carrying the base load, waste-heat and free-cooling hours claimed, water reuse in place at every site above 5 MW.

2035

Densify for AI load

Liquid and immersion cooling as the default for high-density halls, with the electrical topology already sized for the step up.

2047

Firm, clean baseload

Grid, renewable and — where the siting allows — small modular nuclear supply, on an estate designed to accept it rather than rebuilt to.

Sovereignty is an architecture decision, not a hosting label

A facility inside Indian territory still leaks control if its operational telemetry, its video feeds or its model inference call out to somewhere else. That is why every AJEEVI product is built to run inside your own perimeter: DCIM, video analytics, helpdesk and self-hosted AI, on your servers or at the edge.

The practical test we apply is simple. If the external link drops, does the facility still know what it is doing? On our designs it does, because the intelligence sits where the plant sits.

  • Self-hosted models and analytics
  • In-country data residency
  • Open-weight model options
  • Auditable access and retention

Bring us the site, or the policy you are trying to qualify under

We will tell you what it can carry, what it will consume, and which obligations bite — before anyone signs a term sheet.